The Russia investigation is now inside the Oval Office
Washington (CNN)For
months, President Trump has been obsessed -- publicly and privately --
with clearing his name in relation to the ongoing investigation into
Russia's meddling in the 2016 election and potential collusion with
members of his campaign.
Trump,
we know now, repeatedly asked then-FBI Director James Comey whether he,
personally, was under investigation. On three occasions, Comey said he
was not.
"I know I'm not
under investigation," Trump told NBC's Lester Holt in a May 11
interview that came just two days after Trump had fired Comey over, according to the President,
the FBI director's handling of the Russia investigation. "I'm not
talking about campaigns. I'm not talking about anything else," Trump
added. "I'm not under investigation."
That isn't true anymore, according to reporting by The Washington Post on Wednesday night.
That report makes clear that three senior intelligence officers --
Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats, National Security Agency
Director Mike Rogers and and former NSA deputy director Richard Ledgett
-- are being interviewed this week by special counsel Bob Mueller as he
looks into whether Trump obstructed justice in the Russia case.
A source familiar with the matter later told CNN that Mueller's investigators have asked for information and will talk to Coats and Rogers.
This paragraph from the Post story speaks for itself:
"Trump
had received private assurances from then-FBI Director James B. Comey
starting in January that he was not personally under investigation.
Officials say that changed shortly after Comey's firing."
Trump wasn't under investigation personally prior to Comey's firing on May 9. But he is now, according to the Post.
That's absolutely huge -- for several reasons.
First,
it makes it virtually impossible for the President and his
administration to dismiss this probe as a sideshow or small potatoes or a
distraction somehow created by the biased media. (That doesn't mean
they won't do exactly that, of course.) We are now talking about the
President of the United States being investigated for possibly
obstructing justice in relation to a criminal probe about a foreign
government meddling in our elections for the purpose of defeating his
Democratic opponent.
Consider that
paragraph. And consider we are less than 150 days into Trump's
presidency and this -- an investigation by a special counsel who also
happens to be the former FBI director -- is where he finds himself.
Second,
it suggests that not only is the special counsel's investigation
reaching upward in the White House but that is also broadening out from
simply an attempt to answer the question of the breadth of Russia's
hacking and whether it caught up any Trump officials in it.
Looking
into whether Trump obstructed justice means that Mueller is also
examining the circumstances surrounding Comey's firing, which was
obviously not part of the original federal probe led by Comey when he
still had a job as FBI director.
As the Post story notes:
"The
interviews (with Rogers, Coats and Ledgett) suggest that Mueller sees
the question of attempted obstruction of justice as more than just a 'he
said, he said' dispute between the President and the fired FBI
director, an official said."
That's
critical given that Comey's sworn testimony regarding the pressure put
on him by Trump to leave off an investigation into deposed national
security adviser Michael Flynn runs directly counter to Trump's
assertions about their conversations. Trump -- while not under oath,
it's worth noting -- has insisted flatly that he had never urged Comey
to slow or stop the Flynn investigation.
Trump appeared unbowed by the new revelations.
"They
made up a phony collusion with the Russians story, found zero proof, so
now they go for obstruction of justice on the phony story. Nice," he tweeted Thursday morning. He soon added:
"You are witnessing the single greatest WITCH HUNT in American
political history - led by some very bad and conflicted people! #MAGA"
None
of the above makes Trump guilty. But, what it does is take this special
counsel investigation all the way into the Oval Office -- a place where
it hasn't gone before. And it also suggests that Mueller isn't
narrowing the scope of the investigation he took over on May 18, he's widening it.
All of which makes Trump's efforts to belittle the investigation and move past it that much more difficult.
Comments
Post a Comment